Appeal No. 1998-1885
Application No. 07/914,359
claims 11-15 as being unpatentable over Follmer in view of
Harris or
Wareman and further in view of Cherry, we have carefully
considered these secondary references additionally relied upon
by the examiner but find nothing therein that makes up for the
deficiency of Follmer noted above or that otherwise renders
any of the appealed claims obvious within the meaning of 35
U.S.C.
§ 103. Accordingly, these rejections likewise cannot be
sustained.
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
NEAL E. ABRAMS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
LAWRENCE J. STAAB )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007