Appeal No. 1998-1901
Application 08/506,804
an A/D converter which is connected with said signal
adjusting device to generate a digital signal based on said
second analog signal.
The examiner relies on the following references:
Cadet et al. (Cadet) 5,138,149 Aug. 11, 1992
Miyatake et al. (Miyatake) 5,241,575 Aug. 31, 1993
The following rejections are before us on appeal:
1. Claim 14 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112,
second paragraph, as failing to particularly point out and
distinctly claim the invention.
2. Claims 1 and 14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102(b) as being anticipated by the disclosure of Cadet.
3. Claims 2, 4, 5, 7, 16, 17, 19-22, 24 and 25 stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the
teachings of Cadet in view of well known prior art.
4. Claims 8 and 23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103 as being unpatentable over the teachings of Cadet in view
of Miyatake.
5. Claims 9, 10, 12 and 13 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C.
-3-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007