Appeal No. 1998-1901
Application 08/506,804
claimed invention anyway. Therefore, we do not sustain the
examiner’s rejection of claims 9, 10, 12 and 13.
In summary, we have not sustained any of the
examiner’s rejections of the claims on appeal. Accordingly,
the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 7-
10, 12-14, 16, 17 and 19-25 is reversed.
REVERSED
JERRY SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
LANCE LEONARD BARRY )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JS/ki
-9-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007