Ex parte MONROY et al. - Page 1

                                     THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                         

                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was  not written                                                       
                    for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                       
                                                                                                                     Paper No. 11                         
                                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                        
                                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                        
                                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                                          
                                                        Ex parte MARIO F. MONROY                                                                          
                                                            and CRAIG A. JUSTICE                                                                          
                                                            Appeal No. 1998-1924                                                                          
                                                      Application No. 08/642,9071                                                                         
                                                                       ON BRIEF                                                                           
                  Before COHEN, FRANKFORT and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent                                                                             
                  CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                  

                                                              DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                          
                           This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                                                                         
                  rejection of claims 1 through 6.  Claims 7 through 10 are                                                                               
                  objected to as being dependent upon a rejected claim but would                                                                          

                           1Application for patent filed May 6, 1996.                                                                                     

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007