THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 11
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MARIO F. MONROY
and CRAIG A. JUSTICE
____________
Appeal No. 1998-1924
Application No. 08/642,9071
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, FRANKFORT and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 6. Claims 7 through 10 are
objected to as being dependent upon a rejected claim but would
1Application for patent filed May 6, 1996.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007