Appeal No. 1998-1924 Page 7
Application No. 08/642,907
As such, we will not sustain the 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of
independent claim 1, and of dependent claims 2 through 4.
In regard to the examiner’s rejection of claims 5 and 6
under 35 U.S.C. § 103, we have reviewed the disclosures of
Nielson and Horton and find that Nielson and Horton do not
cure the deficiencies noted above for Gierveld and Gray.
Therefore, we will not sustain the rejection of claims 5 and
6.
The decision of the examiner to reject claim 1 through 6
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007