Ex parte CAMERON et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  
                                                            Paper No. 28              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    _____________                                     
                              Ex parte DAVID B. CAMERON                               
                                   JOHN M. ANTOS                                      
                               and CHARLES L. SARGENT                                 
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1998-1970                                  
                               Application 08/587,134                                 
                                   ______________                                     
                                HEARD: APRIL 6, 2000                                  
                                   _______________                                    

          Before COHEN, FRANKFORT and McQUADE, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                     

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner’s final                 
          rejection of claims 13 and 14, the only claims remaining in                 
          the application.  Claims 1-12 have been canceled.                           
               Appellants’ invention relates to a sanitary toilet system              

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007