Ex parte SCHWARZKOPF - Page 5




               Appeal No. 1998-2011                                                                                                 
               Application No. 08/707,267                                                                                           


                       Indeed, the fundamental purpose of a patent claim is to define the scope of protection5                      
               and hence what the claim precludes others from doing.  All things considered, because a                              
               patentee has the right to exclude others from making, using and selling the invention covered                        
               by a United States letters patent, the public must be apprised of what the patent covers, so that                    
               those who approach the area circumscribed by the claims of a patent may more readily and                             
               accurately determine the boundaries of protection in evaluating the possibility of infringement                      
               and dominance.  See In re Hammack, 427 F.2d 1378, 1382, 166 USPQ 204, 208 (CCPA                                      
               1970).                                                                                                               
                       In the present case, we have reviewed the appellant's disclosure to help us determine the                    
               meaning of the above-noted terminology from claim 1.  That review has revealed that the                              
               appellant's specification states at pages 5 and 6 that: (1) the casing of Figure 5 is corrugated and                 
               is formed of "square U-section rings," (2) the rings are each formed by a pair of identical legs                     
               of a width w measured radially of the axis A which is "identical" to a width w measured                              
               parallel to the axis of bights joining the legs of each ring together and (3) the width w is "equal                  
               to about" one fifth of a diameter D of the heater.  Additionally, the appellant's Figure 5 shows                     
               the bights 11 having no curvature along a direction parallel to the axis A of the heater.                            
                       However, these portions of the disclosure do not provide explicit guidelines defining the                    
               terminology "generally," "similarly generally" and "substantially."  Furthermore, there are no                       

                       5See In re Vamco Machine & Tool, Inc., 752 F.2d 1564, 1577 n.5, 224 USPQ 617, 625 n.5 (Fed. Cir.             
               1985).                                                                                                               
                                                                 5                                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007