Ex parte SCHWARZKOPF - Page 10




               Appeal No. 1998-2011                                                                                                 
               Application No. 08/707,267                                                                                           


                       The casing of the heating element disclosed by the German reference comprises a                              
               flexible corrugated hose 3.  As illustrated in Figure 3, the corrugations are rounded and do not                     
               include any flat bight portions.  Bauchert discloses a variety of cross sectional shapes, including                  
               quadrangular (column 2, lines 31-34) , for electric tubular heaters, but does not disclose the use7                                                                             

               of any corrugations on the casing (jacket tube 1) thereof.  Therefore, we fail to see how                            
               Bauchert would have provided any suggestion to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the                        
               corrugations of the German reference so as to comprise pairs of parallel legs extending                              
               transversely of the axis and bight portions which extend flatly (are not rounded) in the axial                       
               direction.  Even if Bauchert would have suggested modification of the casing of the German                           
               reference so as to provide it with a square cross-section (as viewed in a direction normal to the                    
               longitudinal axis thereof), we share the appellant's opinion (reply brief, page 1) that there is no                  
               reason why imparting such a square cross section to the structure would require flattening the                       
               bights of the corrugations in a direction other than normal to the axis.  While the metes and                        
               bounds of the terminology "substantially parallel" as used in claim 1 are not clearly defined, as                    
               discussed above, flatness in a direction normal to the axis cannot reasonably be construed as                        
               flatness "substantially parallel to the axis" as claimed.                                                            
                       Moreover, claim 1 further recites "each web having a longitudinal width equal to at                          
               most one-fifth the width of the legs."  This feature is also not disclosed by the German                             


                       7These shapes pertain to the cross section of the tubular heater normal to the longitudinal axis thereof.    
                                                                10                                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007