Ex parte MANO et al. - Page 12




          Appeal No. 1998-2045                                                        
          Application 08/402,374                                                      


          evidence that the combined teachings of the applied references              
          inherently perform like the claimed invention [brief, pages 7-              
          10; reply brief, pages 1-3].                                                




          The examiner’s combination of Morozumi, Asars and Togashi                   
          is fundamentally based on the examiner’s view that these three              
          references simply represent three conventional teachings of a               
          low leakage current thin-film transistor.  That is, the                     
          examiner asserts that there is nothing remarkable about his                 
          selection of the three applied references because they are                  
          evidence of what was conventional in this art.  We would agree              
          with the examiner that a legitimate case for obviousness could              
          be made in theory if the three applied references related to                
          conventional features of the same or similar transistors.                   
          However, we are unable to draw that conclusion.                             
          The artisan would have appreciated that the operating                       
          characteristics of a transistor are a function of many                      
          variables such as operating voltages, device sizes, and the                 
          materials used in the manufacture of the devices.  It is our                


                                          12                                          





Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007