Ex parte ZANZIG et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)              
          was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is                 
          not binding precedent of the Board.                                         
                                                            Paper No. 22              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                  Ex parte JERALD G. ZANZIG, MARCEL G. STRAGIER and                   
                                  JOHN W. PICKRELL                                    
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1998-2083                                  
                             Application No. 08/471,584                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    

          Before COHEN, NASE, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judges              
          GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner's final              
          rejection of claims 17 and 75 through 81.  Claims 19 and 20,                
          the only other claims remaining in the application, are                     
          objected to as being dependent upon a rejected claim, but                   
          would be allowable                                                          

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007