Ex parte SUZUKI et al. - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                   publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.             

                                                            Paper No. 22              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                              Ex parte YUJIRO SUZUKI,                                 
                                     YUJI AOKI,                                       
                                   AKIO UMEMOTO,                                      
                                        and                                           
                                 MASAMICHI ITABASHI                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1998-2188                                  
                             Application No. 08/581,424                               
                                   ______________                                     
                              HEARD: NOVEMBER 15, 2000                                
                                   _______________                                    

          Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and JERRY SMITH, Administrative                    
          Patent Judges.                                                              
          HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 2                 
          and 4 through 10.                                                           
               The disclosed invention relates to a protective layer                  
          provided on a fluorescent layer in a radiographic intensifying              
          screen.                                                                     






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007