Ex parte PLOMER - Page 1




                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                                                       
                                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                           

                                                                                                                    Paper No. 24                        

                                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                      
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                       
                                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                                         
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                           Ex parte ANTON PLOMER                                                                        
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                           Appeal No. 1998-2275                                                                         
                                                      Application No. 08/428,253                                                                        
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                                      ON BRIEF                                                                          
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                 Before CALVERT, ABRAMS, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                        
                 NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                     



                                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                         
                          This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                                                                        
                 rejection of claims 14-18, 20-27, 29 and 30, which are all of                                                                          
                 the claims pending in this application.1                                                                                               


                          We REVERSE.                                                                                                                   



                          1Claims 14, 16 and 29 were amended subsequent to the                                                                          
                 final rejection.                                                                                                                       





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007