Appeal No. 1998-2275 Page 8
Application No. 08/428,253
We have also reviewed the Korhonen, Elvidge and Alheid
references additionally applied in the rejection of the above-
noted claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103 but find nothing therein
which makes up for the deficiencies of Hartog discussed above.
Accordingly, we cannot sustain the examiner's rejection of
appealed claims 20-23, 25, 27, 29 and 30 under 35 U.S.C. §
103.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject
claims 14-18, 24 and 26 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is reversed
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007