The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROLLAND D. O'GROSKE, KEITH F. THARP,
SANDY J. SHIRK/HEATH, PAUL W. SCHAEFER,
SCOTT M. THORVILSON and MICHAEL K. BROWN
____________
Appeal No. 1998-2368
Application No. 08/443,217
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JERRY SMITH, BARRETT, and BARRY, Administrative Patent
Judges.
BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the rejection of claims 1 and 6. We reverse.
BACKGROUND
The invention at issue in this appeal relates to shielded
cabling. Current carrying cables are commonly shielded from
electromagnetic energy. A conventional shielded cable, e.g.,
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007