Ex parte HEFFNER et al. - Page 1




                             THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                
              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for                         
              publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                
                                                                                     Paper No. 15                        
                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                  
                                                   _____________                                                         
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                    
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                   _____________                                                         
                                Ex parte BRIAN L. HEFFNER and WAYNE V. SORIN                                             
                                                   _____________                                                         
                                                Appeal No. 1998-2473                                                     
                                              Application No. 08/556,890                                                 
                                                   ______________                                                        
                                                      ON BRIEF                                                           
                                                  _______________                                                        
              Before HAIRSTON, KRASS and LALL,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                            
              KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                        

                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                     This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 3 and 6.  Claims 2,              
              4, 5, 7 and 8 have been indicated by the examiner as being allowable and are not before                    
              us on appeal.                                                                                              
                     The invention is directed to an apparatus for providing an alignment mechanism for                  
              coupling light between an optical fiber and the surface of a physical specimen.  An optical                
              signal is applied to the surface and the reflected light is collected and coupled to an optical            


                                                           1                                                             





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007