Appeal No. 1998-2577 Application No. 08/594,054 decoding said processed digitised audio data blocks to produce an audio signal output, wherein said outputted audio signal has the desired variation in playback speed relative to the stored audio signal. The Examiner relies on the following references: Asada et al. (Asada) 4,435,832 Mar. 6, 1984 Hejna, Jr. et al. (Hejna) 5,175,769 Dec. 29, 1992 Claims 1, 3 through 14 and 16 through 26 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Asada in view of Hejna. 2 Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellants and the Examiner, reference is made to the brief and answer for the respective details thereof. OPINION After a careful review of the evidence before us, we will not sustain the rejection of claims 1, 3 through 14 and 16 through 26 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. 2A 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph rejection and a 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection based on Yuzo in view of Hejna have been withdrawn, advisory action, paper no. 11, mailed Jan. 16, 1998. 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007