Appeal No. 1998-2606
Application 08/446,415
SUMMARY
We have sustained the rejection of claims 1 through 21
under the judicially created doctrine of obviousness-type
double patenting only as to claims 1 through 4, 16, 17 and 21.
As to the various rejections of claims 1 through 12 and 14
through 21 under 35 U.S.C. § 103, we have sustained only the
rejections of
15
Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007