Ex parte AYERS et al. - Page 15




          Appeal No. 1998-2606                                                        
          Application 08/446,415                                                      


                                      SUMMARY                                         
               We have sustained the rejection of claims 1 through 21                 
          under the judicially created doctrine of obviousness-type                   
          double patenting only as to claims 1 through 4, 16, 17 and 21.              
          As to the various rejections of claims 1 through 12 and 14                  
          through 21 under 35 U.S.C.  103, we have sustained only the                
          rejections of                                                               
























                                         15                                           





Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007