The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 11 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte WILLIAM B. CUSHMAN ____________ Appeal No. 1998-2610 Application No. 08/451,950 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before FLEMING, HAIRSTON, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the rejection of claims 18 and 19. We reverse. BACKGROUND The invention at issue in this appeal relates to earplugs to protect hearing. The need for hearing protection in noisy environments has long been recognized. Besides providing such protection, however, an earplug ideally should be detectablePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007