THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 29 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte THOMAS W. OSBORN III ____________ Appeal No. 1998-2794 Application No. 08/506,137 ____________ HEARD: JANUARY 27, 2000 ____________ Before ABRAMS, McQUADE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-3 and 5-12, which are all of the claims pending in this application. We reverse. BACKGROUND The appellant's invention relates to an absorbent article having, inter alia, a liquid pervious topsheet, a liquid impervious back sheet joined to the topsheet, an absorbent core between the topsheet and back sheet and a barrier adjacent a longitudinal side edge of thePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007