Appeal No. 1998-2817 Application No. 08/455,366 The rejection of claim 1 under U.S.C.§ 103 will therefore be sustained, as will the rejection of claims 3 through 7, 9 through 13, 15 through 19, 21 through 26 and 28 through 36, grouped therewith. NEW GROUNDS OF REJECTION In accordance with our authority under 37 CFR § 1.196(b), this panel of the board introduces the following new grounds of rejection. Claims 1, 3 through 7, 9 through 13, 15 through 19, 21 through 26 and 28 through 36 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as containing subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to enable one skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and/or use the invention. The scope of enablement must bear a “reasonable correlation” to the scope of the claims (see, e.g., In re Fisher, 427 F.2d 833, 839, 166 USPQ 18, 24 (CCPA 1970)) and “the specification must teach those skilled in the art how to make and use the full scope of the claimed invention without 23Page: Previous 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007