THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte RUEBEN B. WARNER and JOSEPH P. GASER
_____________
Appeal No. 1998-2833
Application No. 08/585,403
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before, and COHEN, CRAWFORD and GONZALES, Administrative
Patent Judges
GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 19 and 36 through 39. Claims 20
through 35 have been canceled. In an advisory action mailed
February 10, 1998, the examiner has indicated that claims 1
through 9, 36 and 37 are allowed. Additionally, on page 2 of
the answer, the examiner has allowed claims 38 and 39 and
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007