Appeal No. 1998-2899 Application No. 08/632,687 assumption or hindsight reconstruction to supply deficiencies in the factual basis for the rejection. See In re Warner, 379 F.2d 1011, 1017, 154 USPQ 173, 177 (CCPA 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1057 (1968). Fellows discloses a first embodiment (see Fig. 1) in which a stretchable seamless printing sleeve 17 is fitted onto a tube 10 having a larger external diameter than the internal diameter of the sleeve. The tube 17 has a passageway 16 and a series of spaced apart circumferential grooves 10b on its outer surface. The passageway 16 and each of grooves 10b is connected to the inside of the tube 10 which, in turn, may be connected to a source of compressed air. Fellows teaches that the printing roll is assembled by sliding the sleeve axially over the seal 13 to the conical part 10a of the tube, at which point the space 13a between seal 13, the end of the sleeve 17 and the end of the tube 10 becomes pressurized. As the sleeve passes over the tube, the interior of the sleeve is internally pressurized by compressed air distributed from inside the tube 9Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007