Ex parte DAWLEY et al. - Page 15




          Appeal No. 1998-2899                                                        
          Application No. 08/632,687                                                  


          cannot be read on the widely spaced grooves 10b or 26 in                    
          Fellows.                                                                    
               In light of the foregoing, we will not sustain the                     
          standing § 103 rejection of independent claim 32 and dependent              
          claims 33 through 35, 37 and 38.                                            
               We have also reviewed the Smith reference applied along                
          with Fellows and Arkell by the examiner against claim 36, and               
          the Tittgemeyer, Vrotacoe and Fischer references applied along              
          with Fellows and Arkell by the examiner against claim 39 on                 
          appeal.  However, we find nothing in these additional                       
          references which makes up for the deficiencies of Fellows and               
          Arkell discussed above regarding claim 32.  Accordingly, we                 
          will also not sustain the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejections               
          of dependent claims 36 and 39.                                              


                                     CONCLUSION                                       
               To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject                   
          claims 32 through 39 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.                     
                                      REVERSED                                        



                                         15                                           





Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007