Ex parte MURAMATSU et al. - Page 1




                           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for             
                               publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                
                                                                                                Paper No. 19              
                                UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                                                      ____________                                                        
                                     BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                   
                                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                                      ____________                                                        
                               Ex parte KATSUJI MURAMATSU and SHOJI IWAMOTO                                               
                                                      ____________                                                        
                                                  Appeal No. 1998-2903                                                    
                                                Application No. 08/607,305                                                
                                                      ____________                                                        
                                                        ON BRIEF                                                          
                                                      ____________                                                        
              Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges.                                            
              DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                         


                                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                                       

                     This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 2-21, 33                  
              and 46-49.  Claim 49 was canceled in an after final amendment, filed Aug. 12, 1997 and                      
              claims 15 and 48 were amended at this time.  Therefore, claims 2-21, 33 and 46-48                           
              remain on appeal.                                                                                           
                     We REVERSE.                                                                                          













Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007