The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 36
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte THOMAS P. BRODY
_____________
Appeal No. 1998-2976
Application No. 08/326,049
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before URYNOWICZ, THOMAS, and HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1, 16, 22-
29, 32-34, 39 and 40, all the claims pending in the application.
The invention pertains to a flat-screen display. Claim 1 is
illustrative and reads as follows:
1. A display, comprising:
a plurality of display modules adapted to be removably
joined to a plurality of similar display modules to form the
flat screen display, each of said flat screen display modules
comprising:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007