Appeal No. 1998-3015 Page 8
Application No. 08/790,373
6. Accordingly, we cannot sustain the examiner's rejection of
appealed claim 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Claim 5 depends from independent claim 1. Claim 5
includes the limitation that the chamber walls form first and
second chamber ports that "open respectively to said first and
second tubular screen ends at the inside of the tubular
screen." For the reasons set forth above with respect to
claims 6 and 7, this limitation is not suggested by the
applied prior art. Accordingly, we cannot sustain the
examiner's rejection of appealed claim 5 under 35 U.S.C. §
103.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007