Ex parte NAGEL et al. - Page 2




               Appeal No. 98-3047                                                                                                 
               Application No. 08/576,539                                                                                         


                                                        BACKGROUND                                                                

                      The invention is directed to a network transmission system having an evaluation unit for storing            

               and updating information regarding network status.  Claim 7 is reproduced below.                                   

                      7.      A transmission system comprising a plurality of network nodes for receiving and                     
                      transmitting packets which contain connection-related status information signals about                      
                      the transmission system in the form of OAM cells, characterized in that a network node                      
                      comprises at least one evaluation unit which:                                                               
                              stores connection-related status information signals extracted from a packet in a                   
                      table, and                                                                                                  
                              irrespective of an order of received packets, periodically performs a                               
                      postprocessing function which determines current, connection-related statuses in a                          
                      given order for each connection based upon any statuses previously stored in the table                      
                      and determined thus far, as well as on the received, connection-related status                              
                      information signals.                                                                                        


                      The examiner relies on the following reference:                                                             

                      Miyagi et al. (Miyagi)                 5,461,607                     Oct. 24, 1995                          
                                                                            (filed  May 31, 1994)                                 

                      We refer to the Final Rejection (Paper No. 10), the Supplemental Final Rejection (Paper No.                 

               12), and the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 17) for a statement of the examiner's position.  We refer                

               to the Brief (Paper No. 16) for appellants’ position.                                                              

                      Claims 1-6 have been canceled.                                                                              

                      Claims 7-13 were objected to in the Final Rejection and the Supplemental Final Rejection.                   

               However, the examiner has withdrawn the objection to the claims.  (Answer, page 2.)                                


                                                              - 2 -                                                               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007