Ex parte GEIGER - Page 1




                The opinion in support of the decision being entered                  
               today was not written for publication and is not binding               
                               precedent of the Board.                                
                                                            Paper No. 25              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                               Ex parte KARL E. GEIGER                                
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1999-0074                                  
                             Application No. 08/401,347                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    

          Before COHEN, STAAB, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent                    
          Judges.                                                                     
          STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s                    
          final rejection of claims 1, 6-10, and 12-16.  Claims 19-21,                
          the only other claims remaining in the application, stand                   
          withdrawn from further consideration under 37 CFR § 1.142(b)                
          as not being readable on the elected species of the invention.              
               Appellant’s invention pertains to a radiator assembly for              

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007