Ex Parte SONTAG - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1999-0107                                                        
          Application No. 08/700,427                                                  

               The invention relates to “sealed, water-soluble containers             
          made of polymer films for preserving chemicals” (specification,             
          page 1).  Claims 1, 2 and 15 are illustrative and read as                   
          follows:                                                                    
               1. A sealed container for preserving chemicals composed of a           
          wall, said wall of said container comprising two superimposed               
          single layer homogeneous and water-soluble polymer films, said              
          two superimposed single layer films being separable without                 
          tearing the films.                                                          
               2. A container according to claim 1, which is filled with at           
          least one chemical.                                                         
               15. A method of using at least one container of claim 2 in a           
          process for the preparation of an aqueous formulation, while                
          avoiding contact with the chemicals employed and maintaining                
          specified dosage rates, which process comprises adding said                 
          containers with stirring, to a mixing tank containing water.                
               The references relied upon by the examiner as evidence of              
          anticipation and obviousness are:                                           
          Hodakowski et al. (Hodakowski)5,080,226           Jan. 14, 1992             
          Gouge et al. (Gouge ‘595)     5,222,595           Jun. 29, 1993             
          Gouge et al. (Gouge ‘601)     5,224,601           Jul.  6, 1993             
          Edwards et al. (Edwards)      5,280,835           Jan. 25, 1994             
               The claims stand rejected as follows:                                  
               a) claim 3 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as                 
          failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the                  
          subject matter the appellant regards as the invention;                      
               b) claims 1 through 11 and 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as              
          being unpatentable over Gouge ‘601;                                         

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007