Ex Parte SONTAG - Page 10




          Appeal No. 1999-0107                                                        
          Application No. 08/700,427                                                  

          water soluble or water dispersible laminated film” (column 2,               
          lines 21 through 24).  The laminated film is                                
               a film which has been made from two or more originally                 
               separated layers which are joined together.  The two                   
               layers may be joined together in the laminate by known                 
               methods.  For example, the layers of the laminate may                  
               be joined by pressure, heating, crosslinking, fusion,                  
               adhesion or any combination thereof.  Adhesion of the                  
               two layers may be obtained through the use of a                        
               separate adhesive, or, when appropriate, water [column                 
               2, lines 25 through 33].                                               
          The films can be formed of polyvinyl alcohol (see column 5, line            
          6 et seq.) and may contain a plasticizer to improve their sealing           
          properties and reduce undesirable stretching (see column 3, lines           
          13 through 21).                                                             
               As apparently conceded by the examiner (see page 10 in the             
          answer), because Edwards’ superimposed films are laminated                  
          together they do not respond to the limitation in claim 1                   
          requiring the superimposed films to be separable without tearing.           
          It is not apparent, nor has the examiner cogently explained, how            
          Gouge ‘601 cures this deficiency.                                           
               Accordingly, we shall not sustain the standing 35 U.S.C.               
          § 103(a) rejection of claim 1, or of dependent claims 2 through             
          14, as being unpatentable over Edwards in view of Gouge ‘601.               
               Claims 12 and 13 depend from claim 1 and require at least              
          one of the container wall films to contain a plasticizer.  The              

                                         10                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007