The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 29 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte HERMANN BOGERT and GERHARD GEISEL ____________ Appeal No. 1999-0272 Application No. 08/605,212 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before COHEN, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. NASE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 7, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 17, 18, 22, 24 and 25. Claims 9, 11, 13, 15, 19, 20, 21 and 23 have been objected to as depending from a non-allowed claim. Claims 1 to 6 have been canceled. 1 1Claims 7, 13, 14, 16, 17 and 24 were amended subsequent to the final rejection.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007