Ex parte LAGACE et al. - Page 1




                   THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                 
         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)         
         was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is            
         not binding precedent of the Board.                                    
                                                        Paper No. 29            
                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                   
                                 _____________                                  
                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                      
                               AND INTERFERENCES                                
                                 _____________                                  
                            Ex parte FREDERIC LAGACE,                           
                             JEAN-FRANCOIS GRONDIN,                             
                                PIERRE CUSSON,                                  
                                MICHEL JULIEN,                                  
                               and DANIEL MARCOUX                               
                                _____________                                   
                              Appeal No. 1999-0316                              
                             Application 08/329,124                             
                                ______________                                  
                                    ON BRIEF                                    
                                _______________                                 

         Before STAAB, McQUADE, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent             
         Judges.                                                                
         McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                  



                               DECISION ON APPEAL                               

              This appeal involves the examiner’s rejection of claims           
         12, 13 and 32 through 34, all of the claims currently pending          
         in the application.                                                    
                                       1                                        





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007