Ex parte ELLIS et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 1999-0512                                                        
          Application No. 08/701,979                                                  


               The full text of the examiner’s rejections and response                
          to the argument presented by appellants appears in the answer               
          (Paper No. 18), while the complete statement of appellants’                 
          argument can be found in the main and reply briefs (Paper Nos.              
          16 and 19).                                                                 


               In the main brief (page 6), appellants indicate that                   
          claims 1 through 5, 7, 9, 20, and 39 stand or fall together,                
          that claim 8 stands or falls alone, that claim 10 stands or                 
          falls alone, that claim 11 stands or falls alone, and that                  
          claim 6 stands or falls alone.  Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §                     
          1.192(c)(7), as to the grouping of claims 1 through 5, 7, 9,                
          20, and 39, we select claim 1 for review, with the remaining                
          claims standing or falling therewith.  Accordingly, we focus                
          our attention exclusively upon claims 1, 8, 10, 11 and 6,                   
          infra.                                                                      


                                       OPINION                                        


               In reaching our conclusion on the issues raised in this                
          appeal, this panel of the board has carefully considered                    
                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007