Ex parte MATSUMOTO et al. - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 1999-0899                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 08/654,752                                                                                                             



                 the examiner's answer, are reproduced in the appendix of                                                                               
                 appellants' brief.                                                                                                                     


                          The references applied in the final rejection are:                                                                            
                 Strapazzini                                           5,091,031                                    Feb. 25,                            
                 1992                                                                                                                                   
                 Salerno et al. (Salerno)                                       4,385,025                                    May                        
                 24, 1983                                                                                                                               
                 Idetsuki et al. (Idetsuki)                            63-78716                                     Apr.  8,                            
                 19881                                                                                                                                  
                 (Japanese Kokai)                                                                                                                       
                          The appealed claims stand finally rejected on the                                                                             
                 following grounds:                                                                                                                     
                 (1) Claims 13 to 19, unpatentable for failure to comply with                                                                           
                 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph;                                                                                                     
                 (2) Claims 13 to 19, unpatentable over Strapazzini in view of                                                                          
                 Idetsuki, under 35 U.S.C. § 103;                                                                                                       
                 (3) Claims 13 to 19, unpatentable over Strapazzini in view of                                                                          
                 Salerno, under 35 U.S.C. § 103.                                                                                                        
                 REJECTION (1)                                                                                                                          
                          The examiner considers claim 13 to be indefinite in that                                                                      

                          1A translation of this reference, prepared for the PTO,                                                                       
                 is forwarded to appellants herewith.                                                                                                   
                                                                           2                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007