The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MATTHEW F. MURGIDA & WILLIAM E. TUCKER
_____________
Appeal No. 1999-0955
Application No. 08/687,8721
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before CALVERT, McQUADE, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent
Judges
GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 16, 19 and 21 through 29, the only claims
remaining in the application. Claims 1 through 15, 17, 182
and 20 have been canceled.
1Application for patent filed July 26, 1996.
Claim 19 was amended subsequent to the final rejection.2
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007