THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication in a law journal and is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JAN J. RIGNEY
____________
Appeal No. 1999-0969
Application No. 08/790,501
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judges,
GONZALES, and LAZARUS, Administrative Patent Judges.
LAZARUS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1, 3, 6-9 and 13. Claims 2, 4, 5, 10-12
and 14-15, the other claims in this application, have been
indicated as allowable, subject to being rewritten in
independent form (answer, page 3).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007