Ex parte YAMAMOTO et al. - Page 5




          Appeal No. 1999-1056                                                        
          Application No. 08/525,844                                                  


          such a manner that the detected lateral dynamic condition                   
          contributes to the actuating steering torque so as to reduce                
          the detected lateral dynamic condition and the change rate of               
          the detected lateral dynamic condition contributes to the                   
          actuating steering torque so as to reduce the detected lateral              
          dynamic condition in a high speed range and so as to increase               
          the detected lateral dynamic condition in a low speed range.                
               Claim 1 is similar to claim 6, except it specifically                  
          defines the detected lateral dynamic condition as the yaw                   
          rate.                                                                       




               The examiner acknowledges that Yamamoto fails “to teach                
          the increase of thee [sic] yaw rate [or lateral dynamic                     
          condition] based on a low speed range or a high speed range”                
          (answer, page 4).  The examiner describes Ito (id.) as                      
          teaching: (1)“a yaw rate in a middle and low speed region”;                 
          (2) the adjustment of the steering reaction force imposed on                
          the steering wheel according to lateral acceleration; (3) an                
          equation for the steering reaction defined as K"(; (4) “the                 


                                          5                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007