Ex parte HEIDENREICH et al. - Page 1

              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for           
                         publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                        
                                                                              Paper No. 14             
                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                    
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                       
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                             
                   Ex parte DAVID C. HEIDENREICH and THOMAS L. RICHARDS                                
                                       Appeal No. 1999-1065                                            
                                   Application No. 08/754,379                                          
                                              ON BRIEF                                                 
            Before FRANKFORT, NASE and GONZALES, Administrative Patent                                 
            GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                     

                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                             
                  This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                               
            rejection of claims 21 through 27 and 30 through 34, which are                             
            all of the claims pending in this application.                                             

                  We REVERSE.                                                                          
                  The appellants’ invention relates to a friction wear pad                             
            for a caliper disk brake.  A copy of the claims under appeal                               
            is set forth in the appendix to the appellants’ brief.                                     

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007