The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 16 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte ROBERT MACK, JAMES C. McKINNEY and KENNETH R. BERGER _____________ Appeal No. 1999-1080 Application No. 08/681,022 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before COHEN, FRANKFORT and GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judges GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 17 through 20. Claims 1 through 16, the only other claims in the application, have been allowed. We AFFIRM. The subject matter on appeal is directed to a multi- chamber pump dispenser (specification, p. 1). An 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007