Ex parte MACK et al. - Page 1




                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today           
                  (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and            
                        (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                    
                                                            Paper No. 16              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                    Ex parte ROBERT MACK, JAMES C. McKINNEY and                       
                                 KENNETH R. BERGER                                    
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1999-1080                                  
                             Application No. 08/681,022                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    

          Before COHEN, FRANKFORT and GONZALES, Administrative Patent                 
          Judges                                                                      
          GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of               
          claims 17 through 20.  Claims 1 through 16, the only other                  
          claims in the application, have been allowed.                               
               We AFFIRM.                                                             
               The subject matter on appeal is directed to a multi-                   
          chamber pump dispenser (specification, p. 1).  An                           
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007