Ex parte CLINE - Page 1




                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication
                                in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.               
                                                                                      Paper No. 14            
                             UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                        
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                           
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                 
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                           Ex parte ROGER M. CLINE                                            
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                              Appeal No. 99-1082                                              
                                           Application No. 08/813,359                                         
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                                   ON BRIEF                                                   
                                                 ____________                                                 
            Before ABRAMS, McQUADE, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.                               
            ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                              




                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                
                   This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-4,    6-15    
            and 17.  Claim 16 has been allowed, and claims 5, 18 and 19 have been indicated as                
            containing allowable subject matter.                                                              


                   We AFFIRM-IN-PART.                                                                         











Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007