The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 14 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ROGER M. CLINE ____________ Appeal No. 99-1082 Application No. 08/813,359 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before ABRAMS, McQUADE, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges. ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-4, 6-15 and 17. Claim 16 has been allowed, and claims 5, 18 and 19 have been indicated as containing allowable subject matter. We AFFIRM-IN-PART.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007