Appeal No. 1999-1499
Application No. 08/764,736
claims, to the applied prior art references, and to the
respective positions articulated by the appellants and the
examiner. As a consequence of our review, we make the
determinations which follow.
As a preliminary matter, our review of the application
file reveals numerous points of objection in the appealed
claims. However, we have read and interpreted the claims in
light of appellants' disclosure, and make the following
observations about claims 1 and 3 through 18 on appeal:
In claim 1;
line 4 "having two opposed arms, each arm having two
brackets" should be --having two opposed brackets, each
bracket having two arms--,
line 5 "bore and" should be --bore; and--,
lines 11-12 "said bearing including a depression on an
end face" should be deleted because "a depression" and "an
outer face" are previously defined in line 7 of claim 1, and
line 13 "said yoke" should be --said second yoke--.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007