Ex parte BRISSETTE et al. - Page 5




                 Appeal No. 1999-1499                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 08/764,736                                                                                                             


                          In claim 11;                                                                                                                  
                          lines 6-7 “two opposing arms, each arm having two                                                                             
                 brackets extending from said arm” should be --two opposing                                                                             
                 brackets, each bracket having two arms extending from said                                                                             
                 bracket--,                                                                                                                             
                          line 20 "said yokes" should be --said second yoke--.                                                                          


                          In claim 12;                                                                                                                  
                          lines 1 and 2 "said second yoke further includes a                                                                            
                 locator finger disposed between said arms" should be --said                                                                            
                 finger is disposed between said arms--, and                                                                                            


                 line 2 "bearings" should be --bearing--.2                                                                                              


                          We note that in their brief (Paper No. 22, page 4)                                                                            
                 appellants indicate that the appealed claims do not stand or                                                                           
                 fall together, and have separately argued the patentability of                                                                         


                          2While appellants' disclosure has provided us with the                                                                        
                 understanding to interpret appealed claims 1 and 3 through 18                                                                          
                 as indicated, these issues should be addressed by the                                                                                  
                 appellants and the examiner upon further prosecution of the                                                                            
                 application.                                                                                                                           
                                                                           5                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007