THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 35 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JOSEPH J. GEIB, WILLIAM J. JONES, RICHARD A. MAZUR, DOUGLAS U. MENNIE, and GARY P. WATTS ____________ Appeal No. 1999-1536 Application No. 08/938,592 ____________ HEARD: February 22, 2000 ____________ Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal to allow claim 49. Claims 51- 54, the only other claims remaining in this application, stand allowed.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007