Appeal No. 1999-1663 Application No. 08/715,221 forces cause transverse waves to radiate into the material and propagate through the material. Of note is that Thompson (‘836) does not make reference to any waves that propagate in the surface of the test block. However, the statement in Thompson (‘836) (col. 3, lines 54-60) discussing changes in shear wave polarization, discloses that when the stress in the block is neither perpendicular nor parallel to the direction of the transducer, the shear wave is decomposed into two waves and that “[b]ecause these two polarized waves are traveling in material under different conditions of stress, their velocity will be different.” From the statement in Attachment “D” supra, “when waves move across an interface with different elastic properties, the velocity, direction and phase of the wave may be changed and will give rise to waves of other modes” it may be implied that a surface wave could be inherently created in Thompson (‘836). Assuming arguendo that the transducer of Thompson (‘836) inherently produced some surface waves, we find that Thompson (‘836) does not teach measuring an acoustic velocity of the surface wave. Nor does Thompson (‘836) teach evaluating the stress based on a 11Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007