Ex parte MOSLEHI - Page 4




          Appeal No. 1999-1666                                                        
          Application No. 08/847,319                                                  



               4.   A direct doping method for semiconductor wafers,                  
          comprising the steps of:                                                    
          providing a semiconductor wafer having a surface;                           
               exposing said surface of said wafer to a non-ionized                   
          process medium in order to directly dope at least a portion of              
          said surface of said wafer, wherein said process medium                     
          comprises a dopant gas, and wherein said dopant gas comprises               
          an organic compound of a dopant species; and                                
               heating said wafer, thermally activating said dopant                   
          species and causing solid state diffusion of said dopant                    
          species into said semiconductor wafer surface, wherein said                 
          doping is performed without the presence of plasma, wherein                 
          said organic compound is a material selected from the group                 
          consisting of (CH ) B, (C H ) B, (OCH ) B, (CH S) BCH ,3 3    2 53       33      3  2  3                          
          (CH ) BN(CH ) , (CH ) BOCH , and CH SB(CH )  in order to dope at3 2    32     33332           3     32                                    
          least portions of said surface of said semiconductor wafer                  
          with p type doping, wherein said dopant species is boron,                   
          wherein said semiconductor wafer is heated to a temperature in              
          the range of 650 C and 1150 C.o         o                                                 
               The prior art relied upon by the examiner as evidence of               
          obviousness are:                                                            
          Melas et al.            4,734,514                Mar. 29, 1988              
          (Melas)                                                                     
          Bohling et al.          4,904,616                Feb. 27, 1990              
          (Bohling)                                                                   
          Kiyota et al.           5,387,545                Feb.  7, 1995              
          (Kiyota)                                 (filed Dec. 12,                    
          1991)   Zhang et al.            5,424,244                Jun.               
          13, 1995                                                                    
          (Zhang)                                   (filed Nov. 4,                    
          1992)                                                                       
               The appealed claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103               
          as follows:                                                                 
                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007