Ex parte NIKKEL et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1999-1718                                                        
          Application 08/786,742                                                      



               said inward side of each of said rotatable clearing disks              
          being attached to one of said disk mounts;                                  
               the forward reach of one of said clearing disks being                  
          spaced between about 3 and about 10 inches from the forward                 
          reach of the other of said clearing disks in a direction along              
          said path; and                                                              
               a mounting means for attaching said apparatus to the farm              
          implement.                                                                  

                                    THE PRIOR ART                                     
               The references relied upon by the examiner as evidence of              
          obviousness are:                                                            
          Carney                        2,698,565                Jan.  4,             
          1955                                                                        
          Williams et al. (Williams)    4,425,973                Jan. 17,             
          1984                                                                        
          White                         4,431,061                Feb. 14,             
          1984                                                                        
          Groff                         5,497,836                Mar. 12,             
          1996                                                                        



                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     


               Claims 1, 3, 5, 7 and 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Williams.                               


               Claim 2 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being              
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007