Appeal No. 1999-1779 Application No. 08/480,561 This feature clearly is not taught by Bardocz, and therefore the reference cannot be anticipatory of the subject matter recited in claim 19. The Section 102(b) rejection of claim 19 and dependent claim 20 therefore is not sustained. SUMMARY The rejection of claims 1-7, 19 and 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first and second paragraphs, is not sustained. The rejection of claims 1-7, 19 and 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is not sustained. The decision of the examiner is reversed. REVERSED ) NEAL E. ABRAMS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT CHARLES E. FRANKFORT ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) JEFFREY V. NASE ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 14Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007