Ex parte ISHIUCHI et al. - Page 1

                                THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                     

                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
                                                   not binding precedent of the Board.                                           
                                                                                                       Paper No. 24              
                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                      
                                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                       
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                            
                Ex parte YUKIO ISHIUCHI, TOSHIKAZU HAMAMOTO, MICHISHIGE SAKAI, MAKOTO                                            
                     NAGATA, HIROSHI WARAGAYA, IWAO ISHII, EIJI KANEKO and HIROYOSHI                                             
                                                      Appeal No. 1999-1818                                                       
                                                   Application No. 08/586,806                                                    
                                                            ON BRIEF                                                             
               Before STAAB, McQUADE, and JENNIFER D. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                        
               JENNIFER D. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                    

                                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                                           
                      This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-5, 7, 8 and                   
               10, which are all of the claims pending in this application.                                                      

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007