THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 34
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MARVIN B. DAVIS and KENT MURPHY
____________
Appeal No. 1999-1924
Application No. 08/486,545
____________
HEARD: March 22, 2000
____________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, HAIRSTON and
NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection (Paper No. 11, mailed December 12, 1996) of claims 1
and 21 to 27, which are all of the claims pending in this
application.1
1While the examiner in the Advisory Action of February
13, 1997 (Paper No. 14) has approved entry of the amendment to
claims 1 and 27 (Paper No. 13, filed January 24, 1997)
(continued...)
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007