Ex parte DAVIS et al.Ex parte FRANCIS L. RICHTER, JAMES WILSON AND - Page 5




          Appeal No. 1999-1924                                       Page 5           
          Application No. 08/486,545                                                  


          same invention or an obvious modification of the same                       
          invention claimed in that inventor's first patent.  See In re               
          Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 892, 225 USPQ 645, 648 (Fed. Cir. 1985).               
          The basic concept of double patenting is that the same                      
          invention cannot be patented more than once since to do so                  
          would result in a second patent that would expire some time                 
          after the first patent expired and extend the protection                    
          timewise.  General Foods Corp. v. Studiengesellschaft Kohle                 
          mbH, 972 F.2d 1272, 1279-80, 23 USPQ2d 1839, 1845 (Fed. Cir.                
          1992); In re Kaplan, 789 F.2d 1574, 1579-80, 229 USPQ 678, 683              
          (Fed. Cir. 1986).                                                           


               35 U.S.C. § 101 states "Whoever invents or discovers any               
          new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition                
          of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may                   
          obtain a patent therefor..." (Emphasis added).  The                         
          prohibition of double patenting of the same invention is based              
          on 35 U.S.C. § 101.  In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 1052, 29                  
          USPQ2d 2010, 2015 (Fed. Cir. 1993); Longi, 759 F.2d at 892,                 
          225 USPQ at 648.  By "same invention," the court means                      








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007